Hemodynamic Monitoring of the Critically Ill Patient
Victor R. Suarez, Radoslaw K. Bukowski and Gary D.V. Hankins
Table Of Contents
Victor R. Suarez, MD
Radoslaw K. Bukowski, MD, PhD
Gary D.V. Hankins, MD
INVASIVE HEMODYNAMIC MONITORING
DOES PULMONARY ARTERY CATHETERIZATION IMPROVE OUTCOME?
In the practice of obstetrics and gynecology, the need for hemodynamic or respiratory resuscitation is fortunately rare; however, all obstetricians and gynecologists encounter the necessity for assessment and monitoring of patients' hemodynamic or respiratory status. This need may occur while managing various complications of pregnancy, such as preterm premature rupture of the membranes or preterm labor complicated by intraamniotic infection and treated with tocolysis and steroids, during peripartum management of preeclampsia or postpartum hemorrhage. The list of possible clinical situations requiring knowledge of the patient's hemodynamic or respiratory status is very long and familiar to those practicing obstetrics and gynecology.
Two basic categories of monitoring are available, invasive and noninvasive. Invasive methods have become the gold standard for monitoring nonpregnant as well as pregnant patients, as their validity and reliability has been established by a large body of evidence. They carry significant risks, and therefore the use of invasive methods of monitoring is recommended for a set of specific indications, when the risks associated with their application are outweighed by benefits of the information they can provide. Therefore, in critically ill patients, the benefits of invasive monitoring are clear. More frequently, however, we are faced with less severe and thus less obvious situations when it would be desirable to assess and monitor the patient's hemodynamic and respiratory status noninvasively.
The noninvasive monitoring of the patient's hemodynamics and oxygenation status have two important applications. First, data obtained may help identify patients who will benefit from invasive monitoring. It will aid in establishing indications for invasive monitoring. Second, in a much larger group of patients, the results of noninvasive monitoring will determine that invasive monitoring is not essential, and in these milder situations, noninvasive monitoring will suffice, thereby avoiding the risks of invasive procedures.
Noninvasive monitoring was first established in management of nonpregnant patients under anesthesia and in the intensive care settings. Our published experience with these methods in obstetrics and gynecology is still limited to a few published studies. Nonetheless, there is a fairly large, however uncontrolled, clinical experience. In general, noninvasive methods allow assessment and trend analysis of cardiac output and peripheral tissue perfusion.
Assessment of Cardiac Output
END-TIDAL CARBON DIOXIDE PRESSURE
End-tidal carbon dioxide (ETCO2) pressure measurement is a good predictor of cardiac output. Because of high lipid solubility and the ability to cross the blood-air barrier, change in exhaled CO2 is a function of pulmonary blood flow and thus indirectly of cardiac output. Therefore, the proportion of CO2 in exhaled gases reflects the cardiac output.1,2 ETCO2 can be measured not only noninvasively, but also very simply, using nasal cannula for oxygen treatment and infrared capnometer, routinely used by anesthesiologists. ETCO2 measurement for estimation of cardiac output has been validated in nonpregnant patients with hypovolemia and during cardiopulmonary resuscitation.3–5 Comparison with invasive measurement of cardiac output demonstrates high correlation (r2 = 0.82).2 ETCO2 might be especially useful in monitoring patients with postpartum hemorrhage (PPH) during volume resuscitation.
Monitoring the hemodynamic status of the patient during severe PPH is crucial, as estimation of blood loss is often imprecise and monitoring provides objective assessment of the effectiveness of resuscitation. It is important, however, to recognize the limitations of many traditional methods of monitoring. Blood pressure is a simple, but insensitive method of evaluation. Blood pressure may remain normal until 30% to 40% of the blood volume is lost, and it may be spuriously low when obtained by arm cuff.2 Direct intraarterial recording is preferred in patients with hypovolemia, but access can be problematic. Additional invasive methods of cardiac output monitoring involve measurement of cardiac filling pressures by either central venous or pulmonary wedge pressure. Even so, these measurements demonstrate poor correlation with the extent of blood loss, especially when it is less then 30% of the blood volume.6 Performance of orthostatic maneuvers may improve the sensitivity of cardiac filling pressures in the monitoring of blood loss.7
A decrease in ETCO2 results in an increase of the PaCO2-ETCO2 gradient indicating impaired elimination of CO2. An increased gradient is an early sign of complications such as pulmonary embolism, atelectasis, pneumonia, pulmonary edema, or low cardiac output. Although ETCO2 cannot differentiate between these complications, it can serve, because of its noninvasiveness, as a useful screening tool.
Before we can routinely use ETCO2 measurements in pregnant patients, it is necessary to establish normative data for this population. Currently, studies are being conducted to confirm ETCO2 validity and reliability in pregnant women.
Unlike ETCO2 measurements, echocardiography for estimation of cardiac output and cardiac filling pressures has been studied in critically ill obstetric patients. Belfort and associates compared cardiac output, right ventricular, right atrial, and pulmonary artery systolic pressures obtained by echocardiography and pulmonary artery catheter in a group of critically ill pregnant patients. They reported no significant differences between the results of the two methods, as well as high correlation of obtained measurements for cardiac output (r2 = 0.98) and cardiac filling pressures (R2 = 0.85 for pulmonary artery systolic pressure).8 The limitation of echocardiography for the purpose of hemodynamic monitoring is that it does not provide continuous measurements. This limitation does not, however, invalidate its usefulness for the intermittent assessment of the patient's hemodynamic status.
Another promising noninvasive method of cardiac output measurement is thoracic bioimpedence. It relies on the principle that conduction of alternating current applied across the thorax changes proportionally to blood volume in the heart and great vessels. Thus, it is also indirectly proportional to cardiac output. Bioimpedence has been validated in nonpregnant patients. Moreover, Clark and colleagues established its validity in a group of eight normal pregnant women. They compared cardiac index measurements using thoracic bioimpedence and pulmonary artery catheterization and demonstrated high correlation of the results of both methods (r2 = 0.89).9 Correlation was best in the left lateral position.
Tissue Perfusion Assessment
Global oxygen delivery and cardiac output are not synonymous with adequate tissue perfusion in critically ill patients. Therefore any, but especially noninvasive, methods of monitoring tissue perfusion would be very valuable for clinical decision-making and management.
VENOUS BLOOD GASES
Monitoring of venous blood gases is simple and provides valuable information on tissue perfusion. Venous blood gases reflect whole body oxygenation and acid-base status of the tissues better than arterial blood gases. The effectiveness of this approach to organ perfusion monitoring has been demonstrated in patients undergoing cardiopulmonary resuscitation.10 The validity of this method in monitoring of critically ill pregnant patients remains to be established.
Measurements of blood lactate concentration help to determine whether the oxygen supply is adequate to sustain aerobic metabolism. In patients with septic shock, this parameter has shown to be a superior predictor of outcome, better than hemodynamic parameters or measures of oxygen transport.11 Values of >2 mmol/L and >4 mmol/L predict mortality in 58% and 80% of patients with positive test results, respectively.12 It is important, however, to state that the ability of lactate concentrations to predict mortality is limited to patients with shock. Also, other reasons for increased lactate, such as hepatic and thiamine insufficiency and alkalosis, have to be excluded. It also appears that in patients with sepsis, an increase in lactate concentration is a direct effect of endotoxin, not oxygen deprivation.13 Importantly, the effectiveness in pregnant patients has to be established. The fact that maternal lactate levels normally increase during the second stage of labor further complicates its applicability in the peripartal period.14
Venous blood gases and arterial lactate are the measurements of oxygen deficit at the whole body level. Gastric tonometry was developed based on the observation that splanchnic hypoperfusion is common in critically ill patients and may precede multiple organ failure.15 The instrument is made of a CO2 permeable balloon attached to the end of a nasogastric tube. It measures gastric mucosal partial pressure of CO2. This measurement is then used together with arterial bicarbonate concentration to calculate pH of the gastric mucosa. Gastric acidosis correlates with the onset of anaerobic metabolism in response to hypoxia or sepsis.16 Although gastric tonometry has been successfully used in nonpregnant critically ill patients over the last decade, we do not have at our disposal any studies validating this technique in obstetrics.17
Clearly there is a place and need for noninvasive hemodynamic monitoring in management of women with complicated pregnancies. Several methods of monitoring that are currently successfully used in nonpregnant patients await their validation in pregnancy. However, before the results of such validity studies become available and the best tests in pregnancy are identified, the relative changes in parameters measured by the above-mentioned techniques can serve as an adjunct in deciding if invasive monitoring is indicated or whether patient can be monitored noninvasively.
|INVASIVE HEMODYNAMIC MONITORING|
Hemodynamic evaluation of the critically ill patient requires full understanding of cardiovascular structure and function. History taking and physical examination should be carried out efficiently, yet thoroughly. Assessment of maternal vital signs, mental status, urine output, and documentation of fetal well-being provides very important evidence of adequacy of circulation and represents the reference to which patient deterioration or effects of treatment will be compared. When rapid deterioration of cardiovascular status occurs, however, reliance on traditional clinical parameters may not allow for timely intervention. Reliable, continuous information may require the use of invasive monitoring, such as an arterial line (intravascular mean arterial pressure), and/or a pulmonary artery catheter (cardiac output and pulmonary arterial and wedge pressures).
Blood pressure can be determined, in decreasing order of reliability, by intravascular catheters, digital oscillometers, and sphygmomanometers. Direct recording of intravascular pressure is recommended for all patients in the intensive care unit who require careful continuous monitoring of arterial pressure.18
Fluid-filled tubing transmits the pressure wave from the cannulated artery to the pressure transducer. Systolic, diastolic, and mean arterial pressures are measured. Mean arterial pressure (MAP) represents the driving pressure to the peripheral organs, and it can be either calculated (MAP = diastolic pressure + 1/3 pulse pressure) or measured by integrating the area under the arterial pressure waveform. The latter method is independent of heart rate and the assumption that diastole represents two thirds of the cardiac cycle.18
Some indications for arterial line placement may include: expectation of hemodynamic instability regardless of etiology; need for continuous blood pressure measurement when using vasoactive drugs (e.g., dopamine, nitroprusside); respiratory insufficiency; intubation for more than 4 to 6 hours; and the need for frequent arterial blood sampling. Some anesthesiologists recommend arterial line placement in situations in which the potential for rapid decrease in blood pressure exists. It has also has been recommended for morbidly obese patients for whom appropriate size cuffs are not available.
Cannulation of the radial artery must be preceded by evaluation of arterial supply to the hand by the Allen test.19 Palpate the radial and ulnar pulses. Ask the patient to make a tight fist with her hand in supine position. Occlude both radial and ulnar arteries with your thumbs. Ask the patient to open and close her hand multiple times (this will make the palm pale). Then release your thumb from one of the arteries. The palm should flush in no more than 5 seconds. Persisting pallor of the palm indicates insufficiency or occlusion of the released artery. Repeat the same procedure and test the other artery. Local anesthesia should be used, as it will both decrease the patient's pain and increase your success rate.
Thrombosis, infection, bleeding, vascular or nerve trauma, and accidental injection of intravenous drugs are potential complications.
Pulmonary Artery Catheter
The pulmonary artery catheter (PAC), often called the Swan-Ganz catheter, is a triple lumen, flow-directed, balloon-tipped, thermodilution catheter (Fig. 1). The catheter's length ranges from 60 to 110 cm and is 2.3 mm (7 Fr) in outside diameter. The standard catheter has 3 ports (a proximal infusion port, a distal infusion port, and a balloon inflation port) and the thermistor connector in its proximal end. The catheter's shaft is mainly made of a polyvinyl chloride derivative and is radiopaque.
The proximal infusion port exits 30 cm from the tip of catheter and after correct insertion should be located in the patient's right atria. This port is used to infuse fluids or medications, and when connected to a transducer with a heparinized line, it is used to continuously monitor the right atrial pressure (RAP), which is equivalent to the central venous pressure (CVP).
The distal infusion port exits at the tip of the catheter, and after correct insertion, it should rest in a branch of the patient's pulmonary artery. This port is connected to a transducer with a heparinized pressure line (continuous flush of 3 mL per hour of heparinized solution in a bag at a pressure of 300 mmHg) to maintain the lumen patent and continuously monitor the pulmonary artery pressure (PAP) when the balloon is deflated, and intermittently the pulmonary capillary wedge pressure (PCWP) when the balloon is inflated. Both the proximal and the distal lumina of the catheter may be used to withdraw samples of venous blood for laboratory studies.
The lumen of the balloon's inflation port ends in small latex balloon, located 0.5 cm from the catheter's tip. The balloon is inflated at the time of catheter advancement and when PCWP is needed. The fully inflated balloon (1.5 mL) creates a recess for the tip, preventing the tip from perforating vessels, valves, or chambers as the catheter is advanced.18 While floating the catheter, there is no limit to the duration of inflation; however, once wedged, it should generally not remain inflated for more than 1 minute.
The thermistor is a temperature sensor and transducer, located in the outer surface at 4 cm from the catheter's tip that can be attached to a thermodilution cardiac output computer. When cardiac output measurement is desired, 10 mL of injectate (usually normal saline at room temperature or a known cold temperature) is infused into the proximal port. The thermistor will determine the blood's temperature at the tip of the catheter before and after the injectate infusion, and the computer will calculate the cardiac output.
Conventional PAC measure pressure and flow is appropriate for assessment of left ventricular function, but right ventricular function, which is more dependent on volume than pressure, is not assessed.20 The standard PAC has been modified to accomplish other functions. The oxymetric PAC, in conjunction with a bedside microprocessor, provides continuous determination of mixed venous blood's hemoglobin oxygen saturation (SvO2), which allows continuous calculation of oxygen consumption (VO2). Another enhanced PAC can measure right ventricular end-diastolic volume and ejection fraction through a combination of electrode sensing and thermodilution.21 Right ventricular ejection fraction catheters allow recognition of right and left ventricle interdependence.22 New thermodilution catheters (with a thermal filament) can measure cardiac output continuously.23 These modified catheters are 7.5 Fr and require an 8.0-Fr introducer. There are other catheters with additional ports that exit 14 cm from the tip through which medication can be given or for passing temporary pacemaker leads into the right ventricle. However, the small size of these ports renders them ineffective for resuscitation with infusion of large volumes of fluid or blood.
INDICATIONS FOR PAC PLACEMENT IN OBSTETRIC PATIENTS
Currently, the PAC is used in obstetrics in the management of critically ill patients or those at risk for sudden decompensation and in clinical investigations that attempt to define the pathophysiology of various disease processes or evaluate therapy of a specific condition.
A list of obstetric conditions for which invasive hemodynamic monitoring may assist in their management was published by the American College of Obstetrics and Gynecology (ACOG) in 1992.24 Invasive monitoring is not needed in every patient with one of these conditions, nor is this an all-inclusive list. This list can be divided into:
*Particularly dangerous structural or physiologic disturbances include primary pulmonary hypertension, Eisenmenger's physiology, aortic coarctation, and mitral stenosis. More precise assessment of their base line condition, both early in pregnancy to assess the risk of continuing the pregnancy and during labor and delivery, as well as prompt evaluation of complications and subsequent therapeutic decisions, should favorably affect both management and outcome.24
CONTRAINDICATIONS FOR PAC PLACEMENT
In general, contraindications are25:
Central Venous Access
The two most common vascular approaches are, in order of preference:
The ability to obtain accurate tracings over prolonged periods can be enhanced by the use of two devices, which are particularly useful in situations that mandate catheter repositioning. A catheter introducer system containing a one-way valve allows a malfunctioning catheter to be advanced, withdrawn, or changed without loss of the venous access. Additionally, sheaths are available that fit over the catheter itself and attach to the introducer port. The sheaths maintain sterility of a segment of the pulmonary artery catheter, allowing its advancement or withdrawal as necessary to obtain accurate pressure tracings.
The hemodynamic parameters can be subdivided in the cardiovascular and pulmonary profiles (Table 1).
In the ICU, blood pressure (BP) and mean arterial pressure (MAP) are obtained through an arterial line; heart rate and rhythm are monitored by continuous electrocardiography. Hemodynamic parameters are either directly measured or calculated (by formula) continuously or intermittently from data obtained with the PAC.
NORMAL HEMODYNAMIC PARAMETERS DURING PREGNANCY
Clark and colleagues studied 10 healthy primiparous volunteers, younger than 26 years of age, carrying a single normal vertex fetus between 36 and 38 weeks confirmed by ultrasonography. Recordings were done in the left lateral recumbent position.27 Each patient served as her own control between 11 and 13 weeks postpartum (surrogate for the nonpregnant state). In summary, they reported a mean rise in cardiac output of 43%, as a result of increase in heart rate (17%) and stroke volume (27%), a significant fall in systemic vascular resistance (21%), and a greater decrease in pulmonary vascular resistance. No significant difference was found in left ventricular stroke work index nor PCWP (Table 2).
*Nonpregnant represents the measurements obtained between 11 and 13 weeks postpartum.
(Clark SL, Cotton DB, Lee W, et al: Central hemodynamic assessment of normal term pregnancy. Am J Obstet Gynecol 161:1439 1989)
No longitudinal hemodynamic studies have been done during the first and second trimesters. Longitudinal studies using thoracic electrical bioimpedance28 and two-dimensional and M-mode echocardiography29,30 have reported changes in hemodynamics during normal pregnancy.
The next parameters are calculated based on PAC data, arterial and mixed venous blood gas analysis, hemoglobin levels, and the patient's fraction of inspired oxygen (FIO2).
The advantages of continuous monitoring of mixed venous blood saturation, as opposed to arterial blood saturation, are many. First, arterial blood samples will almost always have a saturation of 90% or greater, corresponding to a pO2 of 60 to 100 mmHg or greater. Because of the shape of the hemoglobin dissociation curve, fluctuations at these higher levels of oxygen tension are reflected by very small corresponding changes in saturation. Conversely, at the lower levels of oxygen present in venous blood, a linear relationship exists between saturation and tension, making it a sensitive test for detection of physiologic instability. Second, although an arterial blood analysis provides useful information concerning pulmonary oxygen exchange, ventilation, and shunt, it provides little information regarding the overall adequacy of oxygen delivery to peripheral tissues. Because the mixed venous gas reflects the end product of supply and demand, it is superior in this respect. Finally, the addition of a thermodilution cardiac output, in conjunction with a mixed venous gas, can support or refute clinical assumptions made based on the mixed venous oxygen saturation. For example, improvement of mixed venous oxygen saturation with a stable cardiac output is a good prognostic sign and heralds clinical improvement. If, however, the same change in the mixed venous oxygen saturation is accompanied by a 100% increase in cardiac output, it may simply be the first sign of sepsis.26 Continuous monitoring of SvO2 has been advocated for titration of vasoactive and inotropic drugs, adjustment of positive end-expiratory pressure, evaluation of fluid therapy, routine patient care, and an early warning system for changes in cardiorespiratory status.31 Few data are available on the use of this technology in pregnant women. Normal SvO2 values during pregnancy have not been determined yet. Nonpregnant normal SvO2 values are 75% to 85%, persistent SvO2 below 60% being abnormally low.26
One of the main objectives of critical/intensive care monitoring and intervention is to prevent or treat circulatory failure. Circulatory failure is defined as the inability of the cardiovascular system to oxygenate and extract waste material adequately from cells, tissues, or organs. Circulation depends on intact vascular system, adequate oxygen exchange, and cardiac function. Cardiac output is determined by stroke volume and heart rate. Stroke volume is determined by four variables: preload, myocardial contractility, afterload, and heart rate.
Preload is the pressure in the ventricles determined by the amount of blood that returns to heart and the ventricular wall compliance. The measurement for the right ventricular preload is the CVP or RAP. The measurement for the left ventricular preload is the PCWP. The “Frank-Starling law of the heart” describes that an increase in preload stretches the myocardial fiber and causes more forceful contraction up to a point of stretch beyond which the heart fails to contract (dissociation of the actin-myosin complex). The preload can be increased by the administration of crystalloid, colloid, or blood and can be decreased by the use of a diuretic, a vasodilator, or by phlebotomy.
Afterload is the resistance against which blood is pumped. The SVR and PVR are the afterloads to the left and right ventricles, respectively. Increased afterload during heart failure deteriorates cardiac output. Pure α-adrenergic drugs, such as phenylephrine, are used to increase afterload. Decreases in afterload or systemic vascular resistance can be achieved by numerous agents (e.g., hydralazine, labetalol, sodium nitroprusside). In cases of pulmonary hypertension, short-term treatment with epoprostenol may have a role in decompensated heart failure.32
Contractility is the inotropic state (“inherent strength”). RVSWI and LVSWI reflect the performance of the right and left ventricle, respectively. In low-output cardiac failure, both preload and afterload should be optimized first. If this fails to restore the CO to an acceptable level, attention should be directed to improving myocardial contractility. Digitalis and β-sympathomimetics, such as dopamine and dobutamine, are effective in improving myocardial contractility.
Cardiac output can be affected by either very fast or very slow heart rates. The pathophysiologic basis of tachycardia should be determined and corrected (fever, hypovolemia, pain, hypothyroidism). Sustained tachycardia can lead to heart failure from shortened systolic ejection and diastolic filling times or increased myocardial oxygen consumption (ischemia). Fast rate arrhythmias can be treated with adenosine,33 propranolol, digoxin, or a calcium channel blocker such as verapamil.
Pulmonary artery catheterization is invasive and, as such, can never be entirely free of complications, but the rate of complications is low, and the technique has become a routine procedure in virtually all ICUs(Table 3).34,35 Data misinterpretation is an important complication because a monitoring technique can only be as good as the interpretation of the data it provides and the clinical application of this interpretation.36
|DOES PULMONARY ARTERY CATHETERIZATION IMPROVE OUTCOME?|
Between 1945 and 1970, pulmonary artery catheterization was performed exclusively in the cardiac catheterization laboratory by few cardiologists, using semi-rigid catheters under fluoroscopic guidance.37 At that time, their purpose was to diagnose congenital heart diseases, select candidates for surgical correction, and improve understanding of pathophysiology. Swan, Ganz, Forrester, Marcus, Diamond, and Chonette, in 1970, reported pulmonary artery catheterization at the patient's bedside using a flexible flow-directed balloon-tipped catheter, without fluoroscopic guidance.38
Shortly thereafter, the catheter was commercially available, and intensive care unit and operative room physicians used the pulmonary artery catheter (PAC) to determine, monitor, and modify therapy in critically ill and/or hemodynamically unstable patients with a broad spectrum of conditions, accepting its benefits without randomized clinical trials.
In 1996, based on three retrospective observational studies,39–41 experts in critical care medicine called for either a moratorium on the use of PAC for the management of critically ill patients or randomized clinical trials to demonstrate its benefit.42 The first two studies reported that mortality in patients with acute myocardial infarction complicated by congestive heart failure was significantly increased in those who underwent pulmonary artery catheterization. The mortality in patients with acute myocardial infarction complicated by cardiogenic shock was essentially the same with or without PAC. The third study was a multicenter, nonrandomized observational study in which 2184 of 5735 critically ill patients admitted to the medical ICU with nine disease categories underwent pulmonary artery catheterization. Each case was paired to a control with a comparable diagnosis. The results of this paired analysis, in which differences in severity of illness was statistically adjusted, reported increased mortality and cost in patients with PAC.41
In response to the debate, The National Heart, Lung and Blood Institute and the United States Food and Drug Administration in conjunction with several professional societies convened a consensus conference. The proceedings were published in 1997,43 and recommendations were published in 2000.44 This workshop developed four recommendations. Its highest priority recommendation was for implementation of educational programs for training, certification, and quality improvement for physicians and nurses using the PAC. The second set of recommendations included conducting clinical trials investigating pulmonary artery catheterization safety and effectiveness in the following conditions: persistent/refractory congestive heart failure (class IV NYHA), low-risk coronary artery bypass graft surgery, hypoxic lung syndromes, mainly the acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS), and severe sepsis/septic shock, conditions for which equipoise existed as to its benefit.
Essentially, PAC is a diagnostic tool that will improve outcome, only if it permits timely diagnosis and management of conditions for which proven treatment exists. Conversely, use of the PAC will unlikely improve outcome if utilized “late” (i.e., when organ failure and irreversible oxygen debt has already occurred) and/or in conditions for which no therapeutic intervention exists.47–49 To maximize patient outcome, placement of the PAC, acquisition and interpretation of data, and intervention must be performed by trained critical care providers.50,51
The use of the “Swan-Ganz” catheter in obstetrics was first reported in 1977, and it was used to evaluate hemodynamic parameters at 12 and 36 hours postpartum in a case of toxemia complicated by pulmonary edema.52 This PAC was introduced through the femoral artery after a cesarean section. Since then, obstetricians have become more interested and formally trained in the care of the critically ill obstetric population, which in its majority is composed by relatively young and healthy patients acutely affected by conditions unique to pregnancy or by preexisting disorders affected by the pregnancy itself. ACOG published a technical bulletin on invasive hemodynamic monitoring, with emphasis on its indications and data interpretation in 1992.24 It should be noted that the Pulmonary Artery Catheterization and Clinical Outcomes Workshop did not include the participation of ACOG nor the Society for Maternal-Fetal Medicine and did not address the use of PAC in the critically ill obstetric patient.53,54
9. Clark SL, Southwick J, Pivarnik JM et al: A comparison of cardiac index in normal term pregnancy using thoracic electrical bio-impedance and oxygen extraction (Fick) techniques. Obstet Gynecol 83: 669, 1994
24. The American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists. Invasive Hemodynamic in Obstetrics and Gynecology. ACOG Technical Bulletin No. 175. In 2001 Compendium of Selected Publications, pp 567–572. Washington, DC, ACOG, 2001
40. Zion MM, Balkin J, Rosenmann D et al: Use of pulmonary artery catheters in patients with acute myocardial infarction: Analysis of experience in 5,841 patients in the SPRINT registry. Chest 98: 1331, 1990