Ultrasound Imaging of Early Embryonic and Fetal Development | Article | GLOWM

This chapter should be cited as follows:
Tonni G, Grisolia G, et al., Glob Libr Women's Med
ISSN: 1756-2228; DOI 10.3843/GLOWM.419363

The Continuous Textbook of Women’s Medicine SeriesObstetrics Module

Volume 18

Ultrasound in obstetrics

Volume Editors: Professor Caterina M (Katia) Bilardo, Amsterdam UMC, Amsterdam and University of Groningen, Groningen, The Netherlands
Dr Valentina Tsibizova, PREIS International School, Florence, Italy

Chapter

Ultrasound Imaging of Early Embryonic and Fetal Development

First published: September 2023
Updated: August 2026

Study Assessment Option

By answering four multiple-choice questions (randomly selected) after studying this chapter, readers can qualify for Continuing Professional Development points plus a Study Completion Certificate from GLOWM.
See end of chapter for details.

INTRODUCTION

Technological advancements of ultrasound systems and the increasing body of knowledge from embryologic studies have enabled a comparison between intrauterine life in vivo and ultrasonographic imaging.1,2,3 In this chapter, we hope to demonstrate that an overlap between these two disciplines may be possible and that sonographers can now glean further insights into the early periods of human life. Digital imaging and three-dimensional (3D) ultrasound can depict the developing embryo and early fetus in high resolution. The resulting digital datasets have also enabled research institutes to develop and publicly share comprehensive 3D embryonic atlas databases.4,5,6,7

In the Carnegie system, embryonic development is classified into stages based on the internal and external morphology and degree of organ development observed on optical microscopy.8 

CARNEGIE STAGING

Carnegie stages 15–17

At Carnegie stages 15–17 (Figures 1 and 2, and Video 1), corresponding to a crown–rump length (CRL) in the range of 8–14 mm and a gestational age of 6.5–7 weeks, the rhombencephalon (future fourth ventricle) represents the largest cerebral vesicle located in the superior aspect of the cephalic pole. The rhombencephalon appears as an inverted-pyramid shape halo with a mean length of 3.7 mm and a mean volume of 8.5–20 mm3, with the pons flexure at its apex.9,10,11,12,13,14,15,16,17,18,19,20

1

Magnetic resonance image of a human embryo at Carnegie stage 17.

2

Three-dimensional digital reconstruction of the developing brain vesicles and spinal cord in a human embryo at Carnegie stage 15–17. Di, diencephalon; Hyth, hypothalamus; Mes, mesencephalon; Met, metencephalon; Mye, myelencephalon; P, pallium; Rh, rhombencephalon; SP, subpallium; SpC, spinal cord. 

1

Three-dimensional digital reconstruction of the developing central nervous system in a human embryo at Carnegie stage 17.

Carnegie stages 18–20

At Carnegie stages 18–20 (Figures 3 and 4, and Video 2), the CRL is in the range of 16–21 mm, corresponding to 8–9 weeks’ gestation. The embryo has an axial cephalic diameter measuring 6–8 mm and during this time period the prosencephalic, mesencephalic and rhombencephalic cavities become visible on ultrasound. The mesencephalic cavity, initially located in an anterior position, moves to a superior position through a process known as 'cerebral deflexion'. The cerebral hemispheres, including the choroid plexuses (CPs) of the lateral ventricles (LVs), are not always visible.

When the embryo reaches a CRL of 17 mm (8.2 weeks), the curved mesencephalic cavity (future aqueduct of Sylvius) is located anteriorly with the rostral aspect pointing caudally. The diencephalic cavity (future third ventricle) develops posteriorly, while the mesencephalic cavity moves posteriorly. At this stage, the mesencephalic cavity is wide compared to the total volume of the embryonic–fetal unit. The future foramen of Monro appears as a distinct structure in embryos with a CRL ≥19.5 mm at Carnegie stage 19.9,10,11,12,13,14,15,16,17,18,19,20

3

Magnetic resonance image of a human embryo at Carnegie stage 19.

4

Three-dimensional digital reconstruction of the developing central nervous system in a human embryo at Carnegie stage 18–20. Di, diencephalon; Hyth, hypothalamus; Mes, mesencephalon; Met, metencephalon; Mye, myelencephalon; P, pallium; Rh, rhombencephalon; SP, subpallium; SpC, spinal cord.

2

Three-dimensional digital reconstruction of the developing central nervous system in a human embryo at Carnegie stage 19.

Carnegie stages 21–22

At this stage, the embryo has a CRL of 22–26 mm, corresponding to 9 weeks (Figures 5 and 6, and Video 3). The axial cephalic diameter measures 9–12 mm. The CPs of the LVs are visible at this stage. Their volume can be calculated and is in the range of 40–120 mm3, whereas the volume of the LV is in the range of 70–200 mm3. The CPs have a club shape and the cerebral hemispheres have a C-shape with their cortex characterized by a hypoechoic mass. When embryos are ≥ 25 mm, there is a clear difference in the sizes of the rhombencephalic and mesencephalic cavities due to the growth of the cerebellum. The rhombencephalic isthmus is thin and not always visible in its entire length. The mesencephalic cavity is still wide with a distinct prosencephalic isthmus and rhombencephalic isthmus, and the cerebral hemispheres cover three-quarters of the diencephalon.

At this time, the metencephalon (future pons and cerebellum) and myelencephalon (future medulla oblongata) are clearly distinguishable subdivisions of the rhombencephalon).9,10,11,12,13,14,15,16,17,18,19,20

5

Magnetic resonance image of a human embryo at Carnegie stage 22.

6

Three-dimensional digital reconstruction of the developing central nervous system in a human embryo at Carnegie stage 21–22. Di, diencephalon; Hyth, hypothalamus; Mes, mesencephalon; Met, metencephalon; Mye, myelencephalon; P, pallium; Rh, rhombencephalon; SP, subpallium; SpC, spinal cord.

3

Three-dimensional digital reconstruction of the developing central nervous system in a human embryo at Carnegie stage 21–22.

Carnegie stage 23

At Carnegie stage 23, the embryos reach a CRL ≥ 29 mm, corresponding to 10 weeks. The LVs are filled by the CPs, covering the anterior horns, and the diencephalic cavity has a volume >280 mm3. In most cases, the diencephalic cavity is shadowed by the cerebral hemispheres and the falx cerebri starts to develop along the midline. The cerebellar hemispheres become visible, separated along the midline and united at the level of the medullary velum.9,10,11,12,13,14,15,16,17,18,19,20


SONOEMBRYOLOGY

Sixth week of gestation

The embryo at 6 weeks’ gestation measures approximately 5–7 mm, corresponding to Carnegie stage 15. With the advent of real-time high-frequency probes and particularly by using the transvaginal approach, the embryologic structure can be seen within a gestational sac (GS) of 20 mm, measured at the longest longitudinal diameter, and with the accompanying yolk sac (YS). At this stage of development, using 3D ultrasound with HDlive and Silhouette mode, the YS is not seen as a ring structure as when using conventional two-dimensional (2D) ultrasound but as a solid structure adjacent to the living embryo and somewhat resembling a second embryo (Figure 7), although slightly less developed and lacking heart motion. The embryonic heart rate is usually in the range of 90–110 beats per minute (bpm).9,10,11,12,13,14,15,16,17,18,19,20

7

Transvaginal three-dimensional ultrasound showing an embryo and yolk sac at 6 weeks' gestation using HD-live™ with Silhouette™ rendering mode.

Seventh week of gestation

This stage is equivalent to Carnegie stage 16 and the living embryo has now reached a CRL of 9–13 mm. The buds of the upper and lower limbs (Figure 8) become visible as well as the relationship between the umbilical cord and the placenta (Figures 9 and 10). At the cephalic pole, the five secondary cerebral vesicles are visible and distinguishable (Figures 11 and 12). These are observed as four anechoic spaces corresponding to the following structures: (i) prosencephalon (forebrain) - this will further develop into two telencephalic vesicles, whose walls will give rise to the cerebral hemispheres and basal nuclei, while their cavities will become the lateral ventricles; (ii) diencephalon - its walls will form the thalamus, hypothalamus and optic vesicles, and its cavity will become the third ventricle; (iii) mesencephalon (midbrain) - from this region, the aqueduct of Sylvius will develop; (iv) rhombencephalon (hindbrain) - this will subdivide into the metencephalon and myelencephalon. The metencephalon will give rise to the pons and cerebellum and the upper part of the fourth ventricle, whereas the myelencephalon will form the medulla oblongata and the lower part of the fourth ventricle. 

The future mid-face is visible as an 'equals' hyperechogenic sign on an axial plane using 2D ultrasound (Figure 10A). An enhanced cephalocervical flexion is another characteristic of the seventh week of gestation. The primordial ophthalmic bud starts to appear in the cephalic pole as an anechoic bulging in the upper aspect, while in the lateral aspect the primordial external ear becomes visible (Figure 13). The heart rate is usually in the range of 130–160 bpm.9,10,11,12,13,14,15,16,17,18,19,20


8

Transvaginal three-dimensional ultrasound with 'skeleton' and HDlive modes of a fetus at 7 weeks of gestation, showing the spine as well as upper and lower limb buds.

9

Embryo at 7 weeks’ gestation highlighted with Silhouette™ effects. The umbilical cord (UC) has a diameter of 2.8 mm. The yolk sac (YS) sac with its vitelline duct (VD) appears as a double ring structure.

10

Transvaginal 3D volume acquisition of an embryo at 7 weeks’ gestation. (A) The volume box frames the volume of interest (VOI), represented by the green bar, that will be stored during the volume sweep. The cerebral vesicles start to appear within the cephalic pole as small anechoic spaces. The prosencephalon, diencephalon, mesencephalon and rhombencephalon can be recognized. The buds of the upper and lower limbs also appear. The future mid-face is visible as an 'equals' hyperechoic sign. (B) Embryo displayed with HDlive and Silhouette™ effects, showing the relationship between the umbilical cord and placenta.

11

(A) Three-dimensional ultrasound image (sagittal plane) showing the cerebral cavities of a fetus at 7 weeks' gestation. (B) Using inversion mode, the cerebral cavities with cleavage of the prosencephalon are seen. Chp, choroid plexus/es; Tel, telencephalon (cerebral hemispheres, basal nuclei); Di, diencephalon (thalamus, hypothalamus and optic vesicle); Mes, mesencephalon (midbrain) with the cephalic flexure; Rh/isthm, rhombencephalon with its isthmus or pontine flexure (hindbrain).

12

Three-dimensional transvaginal ultrasound at 7 weeks' gestation. Left: ultrasound image showing the manually traced curved line used for OmniView™ reconstruction. Right: corresponding OmniView™ reconstruction using inversion mode, demonstrating the C-shaped developing brain vesicles.

13

Transvaginal three-dimensional volume acquisition of an embryo at 7 weeks’ gestation using HDlive with Silhouette™ application showing a thick umbilical cord (UC) with a maximum diameter of 2.8 mm and a yolk sac (YS) with its elongated vitelline duct (VD). In this sagittal plane, the primordial optic vesicle appearing as an anechoic bulging in the upper aspect is detectable. In the posterolateral aspect of the cephalic pole, the primordial external ear becomes visible. In the lower portion of the embryo, the process of progressive tail atrophy has started.

Eighth week of gestation

During this stage of development, the embryo reaches a CRL of 16–19 mm, corresponding to Carnegie stage 18. The flexion between the cephalic pole and the cervical region becomes evident (Figure 14). The cerebral vesicles are growing, and the cleavage of the prosencephalon can be identified. In a sagittal plane of the cephalic pole, the four cerebral vesicles are seen. The diencephalon, mesencephalon and rhombencephalon are recognizable, as well as the lateral ventricles (Figure 15). Elongation of the fetal trunk is also evident compared with an embryo at 7 weeks. There is progressive reduction of the tail that culminates in tail atrophy. A transverse section at the level of the umbilical cord (UC) demonstrates the umbilical vessels consisting of one umbilical vein (UV) and two umbilical arteries (UAs).9,10,11,12,13,14,15,16,17,18,19,20


14

Transvaginal three-dimensional ultrasound acquisition of an embryo at 8 weeks' gestation using 'Crystal Vue' (A) and an embryo at 8 weeks using HD-Live (B).

15

Embryonic neuroimaging at 8 weeks' gestation using different three-dimensional applications to highlight the cerebral cavities. (A) Crystal Vue. (B) Inversion mode.

Ninth week of gestation

During this week, the embryo elongates, its CRL usually measuring 20–26 mm (Figures 16–18, and Video 4). This corresponds to Carnegie stage 19. The cephalic pole presents 'exaggerated' growth compared with the remaining embryonic anatomy. The developing eyes are now clearly distinguishable, either in a coronal or longitudinal plane. The future nasal bone, primary palate, maxilla and mandible are also detectable. The buds of both upper and lower limbs protrude ventrally, and the fingers become visible at this stage compared with the toes, as they are in a fixed flexed position across the fetal trunk. The trunk has continued its process of elongation and straightens at the abdominal level. The presence of physiological herniation of the mid-gut, appearing as a rounded isoechoic, bulging structure contained within the peritoneal membrane and located at the base of the umbilical cord, is another characteristic finding at this stage of development (Figure 17). This herniation occurs because the growth of the primitive intestine proceeds at a higher rate than that of the abdominal wall. The embryo is approaching the next step of its growth and will finally become a fetus.9,10,11,12,13,14,15,16,17,18,19,20

16

Three-dimensional transvaginal ultrasound imaging at 9 weeks' gestation, showing the cerebral cavities in sagittal (A,B) and axial (C,D) planes. Chp, choroid plexus of the lateral ventricle; Mes, mesencephalon; Rh/f4th V, rhombencephalon and choroid plexus of the fourth ventricle within the rhombencephalic cavity; T, telencephalon with the choroid plexus of the lateral ventricle.

17

Three-dimensional ultrasound imaging using surface rendering mode in a fetus at 9 weeks' gestation showing physiological omphalocele (Onf.).

18

Transvaginal ultrasound at 9 weeks’ gestation in midsagittal plane. (A) Two-dimensional ultrasound imaging of the cephalic pole allows visualization of the following structures: choroid plexuses (CP) of the lateral ventricles, frontal bone and bony structures of the midface represented by the nasal bones (NB, two echogenic lines), the primary palate (PP) and the mandible (M). (B) STIC with color Doppler and glass-body mode rendering shows the heart, the aortic arch with both internal (ICA) and external carotid artery (ECA, bud of the third aortic arch), the descending aorta (DAo) and umbilical vessels (UV). The lowest cavity of the rhombencephalon is clearly seen. Also visible at this stage is the fluid behind the neck (nuchal translucency, NT) and the genital tubercle (GT).

4

Three-dimensional ultrasound performed in a fetus at 9 weeks' gestation showing the arteriovenous system using HD-Flow™ application.

Tenth week of gestation

During the last phase of embryological development, the embryo measures 22–26 mm, equivalent to Carnegie stages 21–22. The angle between the head and the trunk approaches 30°, with the head representing almost 50% of the total size of the embryo. The calvarium has started its mineralization process; the frontal bone is visible as a hyperechoic contour in the sagittal plane, and the CPs of the LVs are the most developed intracranial structure visible, surrounded by the anechoic cerebrospinal fluid (CSF). The bony structures forming the midface are evident as echogenic lines: the nasal bones, just below the frontal bone; the primary palate, recognizable as a hyperechoic line with an oblique and inner direction; and the hyperechogenic dot of the mandible.9,10,11,12,13,14,15,16,17,18,19,20,21

During this week, physiologic herniation of the mid-gut with its characteristic bulging will normally disappear as the small bowel undergoes a process of re-entering the abdomen. Failure of this process will generate a midline umbilical defect (omphalocele). Right-sided defects (gastroschisis) have a different etiological mechanism.

In humans, six pairs of aortic arches are described, although the fifth arch is usually absent or rudimentary. The first arch is completed by day 24 but begins to remodel by day 26 as the second arch appears. The third and fourth arches are established by day 28, around the time the second arch begins to regress, followed by the appearance of the sixth arch on day 29. While the derivatives of the first three arches remain relatively bilateral, the fourth and sixth arches undergo significant remodeling to develop asymmetrically into the definitive great vessels.21 


The relationship between completed gestational age, Carnegie stage, CRL and the embryonic and early fetal anatomy visible on ultrasound examination is summarized in Table 1.

1

Normal embryonic and early fetal development on ultrasound: corresponding gestational age, Carnegie stage, crown–rump length (CRL) and anatomical landmarks.

Embryonic development and early fetal period (weeks)

Carnegie stage

Crown–rump length (mm)

Embryonic and early fetal anatomy visible on ultrasound

5+0–5+6

 10

0–3

YS; embryonic pole visible close to YS, HR ~ 80–100 bpm

6+0–6+6

12–15

4–9

YS, HR ~ 100–120 bpm, rhombencephalic and mesencephalic cavities appear.

7+0–7+6

15–17

 9–14

Embryonic tail is visible; physiologic omphalocele process starts, cephalic pole grows and cephalo-cervical flexion starts, three C-shaped cerebral vesicles become visible (diencephalon, mesencephalon and rhombencephalon): in a sagittal plane the diencephalon is the upper cavity, the mesencephalon the middle cavity while the rhombencephalon is the lowest cavity of the brain, the ChP of the lateral ventricles are visible, the VD is still visible as the umbilical cord, limb buds appear, HR ~ 130–160 bpm, spine appears as two echogenic lines.

8+0–8+6

18–19

15–20

Diencephalon/third ventricle and mesencephalon/future AS are visible, ChP of the LV and ChP of the rhombencephalon (future fourth ventricle) are detectable, heart and aorta visible with color Doppler, HR ~ 160–180 bpm, limb buds visible with the progressive regression of the tail, the VD undergoes to coalescence while the UC has a mean section diameter of 2.8 mm.

9+0–9+6

20–22

20.4–26.4

Flexion of the cephalic pole, optic vesicle visible, external ear visible, the narrow isthmus rhombencephali can be seen between the mesencephalon and the rhombencephalon, the mesencephalon/AS is clearly visible in axial plane, disproportion between the AS and the rhombencephalon due to the development of the primordial cerebellum, the ChP of the fourth ventricle extends through the roof of the rhombencephalic cavity by dividing into a rostral and caudal portion, the elongation of the thorax, process of coalescence of the tail started, HR ~ 160–170 bpm, ossification centers visible, mid-face starts to be detectable, fingers may become visible, stomach, physiologic omphalocele.

10+0–10+6

23

>29

Embryo becomes a fetus with human appearance, cephalic pole is the highest structure.

AS, aqueduct of Sylvius; ChP, choroid plexus/es; HR, heart rate; bpm, beats per minute; LV, lateral ventricle; UC, umbilical cord; US, ultrasound; VD, vitelline duct; YS, yolk sac.

SKULL, BRAIN AND NECK

With sonoembryology, we have been able to demonstrate an overlap between embryonic development of the early brain and findings on ultrasonography.1,2,12,13,14,15,16,17,18,19 Similarly, the skull and midface start their development between 5 and 7 weeks’ gestation, corresponding to Carnegie stages 12–16. The skull is composed of two different portions: the first, called the 'neurocranium', which will house the developing brain and is subdivided into the cranial vault and the cranial base of the skull; the second, called 'splanchnocranium', which will develop into the midface. These bony structures are the most complex bone arrangement of the embryo–fetal skeleton, as they are responsible for protecting the central nervous system (CNS), the eyes, ears, and the oral and nasal cavities. The skull originates from two different and separate mechanisms: intramembranous ossification and endochondral ossification. The formation of these bones follows the general process that involves the cartilage that derives from mesenchymal thickening, i.e. apposition and reabsorption. The neurocranium consists of neural crest cells and paraxial mesoderm that will form the frontal and temporal bones (the cells derived from the neural crest), while those deriving from the paraxial mesoderm will later form the parietal and occipital bones, respectively (Figure 19). The splanchnocranium derives from the first and second pharyngeal arches and is further subdivided into the maxillary process (temporal bones, zygomatic bone, palatine bone, nasal bone, vomer, lacrimal bone and maxilla) and the mandibular process. All the abovementioned bony structures derive from the first pharyngeal arch, whereas the styloid process, the stapes, and the upper part of the hyoid bone originate from the second pharyngeal arch.

The mandible begins to develop around 7–8 weeks' gestation by intramembranous ossification adjacent to Meckel's cartilage and is the first bone of the skull to ossify. The different bones of the skull are interconnected by a series of sutures and six halos of fibrous areas called fontanelles, of which the two most important are the bregmatic fontanelle (the largest and anterior) and the lambdoid fontanelle (the smallest and posterior). As cranial development progresses, ossification of the calvarium begins at around 10 weeks' gestation, first involving the frontal and parietal bones. For this reason, at this early stage of development, ultrasound evaluation and imaging of the embryo-fetal skeleton is scanty, even following the advent of real-time high-frequency equipment and the introduction of 3D ultrasound. However, the use of more recently developed four-dimensional applications allows enhancement in visualization of the cranium.22,23,24,25,26

19

Three-dimensional ultrasound using transvaginal approach in a fetus at 9 weeks' gestation with 'skeleton' mode showing the frontal, parietal and occipital bones.

There are several CNS abnormalities that can be clearly and accurately diagnosed as early as the first trimester of pregnancy, even before 11 weeks’ gestation.27,28,29 The acrania–exencephaly–anencephaly (AEA) sequence is an embryonic maldevelopmental process that occurs around day 21 of embryogenesis, at the level of the anterior neuropore. A new classification of this sequence, based on specific phenotypic presentations, has been proposed and includes the following patterns: bilobular cranial appearance, cystic, foreshortened, elongated and overhanging types, and more recently the 'turban' sign phenotype (Figure 20). Folic acid metabolism perturbation and caffeine intake are among30,31 the recognized etiopathogenetic mechanisms, although in some other cases it may be secondary to an early amnion rupture resulting in the creation of amniotic band syndrome with entrapment of cerebrospinal fluid.32,33,34,35,36 The presence of an amniotic band may not only be causative of specific AEA phenotypes, as seen for the turban sign phenotype, but may also be responsible for decapitating (decollatio) the developing embryo (Figure 21).

20

Ultrasound images of two different types of acrania–exencephaly–anencephaly (AEA) sequence: the 'turban' phenotype detected at 10 weeks (A) and the 'bilobular' phenotype detected at 10 weeks' gestation (B).


21

(a) Embryonic decapitation (decollatio) caused by an amniotic band at 9 weeks' gestation. Transvaginal three-dimensional ultrasound with HDlive™ Silhouette™ rendering. Note the amniotic band traversing the amniotic cavity (hand symbols). (b) Postmortem pathology confirming decapitation secondary to spontaneous amniotic band syndrome. The pathology was obtained following induction of the non-viable embryo by vaginal administration of prostaglandin E. Note the associated presence of an umbilical cord cyst.

Another defect that is classified as a neural tube defect (NTD) is iniencephaly. This condition, occurring with an incidence of 0.1–10/10,000 births,37 is characterized by hyperextension of the cephalic pole and is usually associated with the presence of spina bifida and other structural defects such as encephalomeningocele, hydrocephalus, Dandy–Walker malformation, cardiac defects, omphalocele and gastroschisis, and renal anomalies.38,39 Iniencephaly is related to multiple pathogenetic mechanisms, including polymorphisms in the metabolic pathway of MTHFR (methylenetetrahydrofolate reductase) and chromosomal abnormalities.40,41 The onset of cerebral dysraphism takes place as the first phase of the development of anencephaly and is a mesenchymal defect occurring before days 18–20 and the 28th day post-fertilization, equivalent to Carnegie stages 8–9.42,43 Iniencephaly diagnosed in the early first trimester is rarely reported in the literature. Tonni et al. have described a case occurring in a 41-year-old mother with polymorphisms involved in folic metabolism (MTHFR, MTRR, CBS), in which iniencephaly was detected at 12 weeks’ gestation in a fetus with proven trisomy 18 on chorionic villus sampling.41 In a previous observation, iniencephaly was seen associated with alobar holoprosencephaly (HPE) in a fetus with trisomy 13, confirming a potential role of common trisomy and chromosomal abnormalities in the pathogenetic mechanism.44

The neurulation process is completed by Carnegie stage 12, corresponding to approximately 5½ weeks of gestation. During this period, the neural plate folds and closes to form the neural tube. About a week later, at Carnegie stages 15–16, the future telencephalic vesicles begin to appear. However, if signaling from the notochord is altered during this stage, abnormal forebrain induction may occur, potentially resulting in alobar holoprosencephaly (HPE).45,46,47,48,49,50 (Figure 22)

As noted above, the prosencephalon undergoes a process of cleavage that will give rise to the telencephalon and diencephalon. A subsequent division of the telencephalon forms the cerebral hemispheres and the lateral ventricles, while the thalami and the third ventricle originate from the diencephalon. A complete or partial failure of the telencephalon to separate into two cerebral hemispheres results in a holosphere with a single cerebral ventricle, the characteristic feature of the alobar type of HPE.46,49,50 This condition has an estimated prevalence of 1 in 250 embryos and is the most common CNS abnormality involving the forebrain.51 As a gastrulation defect, HPE occurs in a critical period during embryogenesis that ranges from the 18th to the 28th day post-fertilization52 and affects 1 : 10,000 live births.53,54 Although HPE is the consequence of a defective gastrulation process of the neural tube, it can also be seen associated with genetic abnormalities and syndromes and with a defect in the signaling cascade of the Sonic hedgehog (Shh).55,56,57

22

Transvaginal ultrasound performed in a fetus at 9 weeks’ gestation showing alobar holoprosencephaly. Note the single ventricle (SV).

Fetuses may exhibit increased nuchal translucency (NT) or cystic hygroma before the 11th week of gestation (Figures 23 and 24). Standard screening for common trisomies is typically performed between 11+0 and 13+6 weeks’ gestation, in conjunction with first-trimester biochemical testing and cell-free fetal DNA screening. The distinction between markedly increased NT and early cystic hygroma can be difficult, particularly before the conventional NT screening window.

23

Three-dimensional ultrasound performed with Crystal Vue™ at 9+3 weeks' gestation (A) and at 9+6 weeks' gestation (B) demonstrating increased nuchal translucency (NT).

24

Two-dimensional ultrasound (A) and three-dimensional ultrasound with HDlive™ rendering (B) performed in a fetus at 9 weeks' gestation showing a cystic hygroma (arrows) and a dilated stomach with enlarged omphalocele. Chorionic villus sampling demonstrated 45,X monosomy.

SKELETAL SYSTEM

The skeletal system as well as the limb buds start to be sonographically visible from 7 weeks. As we have seen, the limb buds start to be detected from week 7 onwards, as well as the fetal spine, especially when using a novel four-dimensional (4D) ultrasound application in skeleton mode.19 Even at an early stage of development, as early as 10 weeks’ gestation, rare skeletal dysplasias such as radial aplasia with club hand can be diagnosed (Figure 25).

25

Two-dimensional (A) and three-dimensional ultrasound using Realistic Vue™ (B,C) imaging of radial aplasia associated with club hand (H) in a fetus at 10 weeks' gestation.

THORAX, ABDOMEN AND URINARY SYSTEM

Body-stalk anomaly is a rare disease that has been reported to have an incidence of 1 in 14,000–42,000 pregnancies, although a study performed in the metropolitan area of London showed a prevalence estimated at 1 in 7500 fetuses at 10–14 weeks’ gestation.73 The anatomical and sonographic diagnostic clusters can vary, but a major anterior abdominal defect with eviscerated organs, kyphoscoliosis, limb defects, and a very short or absent umbilical cord are usually key features of this lethal condition.72,73,74,75 Although the pathogenesis has not been fully elucidated, a potential mechanism of this embryologic maldevelopment may cause early amnion rupture with subsequent formation of amniotic band syndrome, early embryonic vascular disruption, as well as abnormal embryonic folding occurring at 1–4 weeks postconception.73,76,77,78 This rare disease is characterized by organ eventration lying in the amniotic cavity, whereas the lower portion of the embryo–fetal body lies in the celomic space (Figure 26). According to Russo et al.,79 two different phenotypes can be detected and caused by different pathogenetic mechanisms. One might be secondary to a vascular disruption and characterized by the presence of amniotic band syndrome with craniofacial defect. The other phenotype might be a consequence of embryonic maldevelopment and is associated with urogenital, anal and abnormal abdominal attachment to the placenta secondary to agenesis or severe shortening of the umbilical cord. These anatomical and sonographic defects are diagnostic clues of the condition that should guide the sonographer to an accurate prenatal diagnosis after excluding other pathologic abnormalities of the fetal abdomen, such as omphalocele and/or gastroschisis. This defect is associated with a lethal prognosis.

26

Three-dimensional ultrasound performed using HDlive™ (A) in a fetus affected by body-stalk anomaly at 10 weeks’ gestation. The anatomical landmarks of the disease are better detailed in this case in the right image (B) obtained at 12 weeks' gestation at the time of fetal karyotyping by chorionic villus sampling (normal result), where abdominal eventration of organs into the amniotic cavity are clearly seen. The lower portion of the fetal body is usually located in the celomic cavity.

A right-sided herniation at the level of the umbilical cord insertion invariably results in herniation of the mid-gut, a condition known as gastroschisis (Figure 27). Gastroschisis is not usually associated with chromosomal abnormalities, however, in a series of 24 cases of fetuses with abdominal wall defect (16 omphalocele, eight gastroschisis), 50% of the fetuses with gastroschisis had associated structural anomalies.80 Gastroschisis is defined by the presence of a bulky structure at the right side of the umbilical cord that is not covered by a membrane, compared with the finding of omphalocele (Figures 28 and 29),81,82,83,84,85,8687,88,89 and not usually associated with fetal ascites. Fetal magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), especially using the ultrafast single-shot spin-echo (SS-SE) technique has been shown to be clinically useful in monitoring the integrity of the loops of small bowel, together with α-fetoprotein level determination by amniocentesis. All these procedures can be integrated antenatally with the intent to capture potential sonographic, radiologic and biochemical indirect signs of bowel injury and to better plan the timing and mode of delivery; elective Cesarean section may facilitate coordinated and prompt surgical intervention by a multispecialist team.90,91

27

Three-dimensional ultrasound performed in a fetus at 10 weeks' gestation using HDlive™ application in frontal (A) and longitudinal (B) planes, showing mid-gut herniation due to gastroschisis.

28

Two-dimensional transvaginal ultrasound at 9 weeks' gestation showing an omphalocele (Onf.). (A) Grayscale image (with sepia tint). (B) Corresponding color Doppler image demonstrating vascularity within the herniated contents. Chorionic villus sampling subsequently confirmed trisomy 18.

29

Three-dimensional transvaginal ultrasound with HDlive™ rendering at 9 weeks' gestation demonstrating an omphalocele (Onf.). (A) HDlive-rendered image. (B) Corresponding HDlive image with color Doppler demonstrating the relationship between the omphalocele and umbilical cord (UC).

Lower urinary tract obstruction (LUTO), with an estimated incidence of 0.06%,92 can be identified once fetal urine is being produced from 10 weeks’ gestation onwards.93 The prenatal ultrasound diagnosis is usually based on a bladder diameter >7 mm, and >12 mm in severe cases.92,93,94 A gestational-age-dependent measure suggests the size of the bladder larger than 10% of the CRL.92 In a large series of approximately 25,000 pregnancies scanned at 10–14 weeks' gestation, fetuses with megacystis had a minimum longitudinal bladder diameter/CRL ratio of 13%.92 In normal fetuses, the bladder was consistently visualized once the CRL reached 67 mm (approximately 13 weeks' gestation). Fetal megacystis can be associated with chromosomal anomalies and for this reason fetal karyotyping is clinically recommended.92 Although megacystis is rare,95,96 it is important to reach a correct prenatal diagnosis, as megacystis may be a feature of other complex congenital malformations such as the omphalocele-exstrophy-imperforate anus-spinal defect (OEIS) complex, in order to provide appropriate prenatal counseling and estimation of recurrence risk, even though in utero and perinatal prognosis is sometimes challenging.94,97 Two recent surveys have evaluated the performance of ultrasound in detecting fetal congenital anomalies. The first, published in 2019 by Bardi et al.,98 reported a detection rate of 100% for megacystis between 11+0 and 13+6 weeks’ gestation. In contrast, a more recent survey reported a detection rate of 70% when scans were performed at <14 weeks’ gestation; however, the prevalence in fetuses <11 weeks was not specified.99 Another collaborative study conducted on fetuses with a prenatal diagnosis of LUTO <18 weeks concluded that no significant differences in the number of glomeruli generations could be identified between the early-unfavorable-prognosis group (≤18 weeks) and the group with a favorable prognosis.100 Increased nuchal translucency, single umbilical artery and congenital heart defects are the most common associated abnormalities.94

AMNION, YOLK SAC AND EARLY DEVELOPMENTAL FINDINGS 

The fetal adnexa, amnion and yolk sac can be clearly visualized as a 'see-through' snapshot from around 7 weeks' gestation, particularly using transvaginal three-dimensional ultrasound with advanced rendering techniques such as HDlive™, Realistic Vue™ and Crystal Vue™ (Figure 30). From 7–8 weeks onwards, the limb buds, developing skeletal structures and spine also become visible.

At this stage of embryonic development, ultrasound may demonstrate a range of early developmental findings involving the amnion, yolk sac and umbilical cord, including umbilical cord cysts, abnormalities of the yolk sac (such as enlargement, hydropic change or marked hypoplasia), and an abnormal relationship between the size of the embryo and the surrounding amniotic cavity.

Umbilical cord cysts (Figure 31) generally have a favorable intrauterine outcome and may resolve spontaneously during pregnancy. They are classified as true cysts and pseudocysts. True cysts have been reported in approximately 3.4% of first-trimester pregnancies, with persistence into the second trimester in around 20% of cases. The two types can be distinguished by their location: true cysts are situated close to the insertion of the umbilical cord, whereas pseudocysts are usually located more distally. Although isolated umbilical cord cysts are generally associated with a favorable outcome, an association with chromosomal abnormalities and congenital anomalies should be considered during counseling.101

Abnormalities of the yolk sac may also be recognized during the first trimester. A yolk sac measuring >7 mm in diameter or demonstrating hydropic enlargement (Figures 32–34) is strongly associated with aneuploidy and an increased risk of early pregnancy loss.102 Conversely, an abnormally small and hyperechogenic yolk sac (Figure 35) may also indicate abnormal early embryonic development. An abnormal relationship between the embryo and the surrounding amniotic cavity (Figure 36) represents a further early developmental finding that should prompt careful assessment of embryonic development and pregnancy viability.

30

Transvaginal three-dimensional ultrasound imaging with HDlive™ rendering mode of a normal embryo (E) at 7 weeks' gestation. The amnion (Am) and yolk sac (YS) become visible at this stage.

31

Three-dimensional ultrasound performed using Crystal Vue™ (A) and Realistic Vue™ (B) in two different fetuses affected by two different types of umbilical cord cyst diagnosed at 8 weeks' gestation. Note that while in (A) the umbilical cyst is close to the insertion of the cord (true cyst), in (B) the umbilical cyst is located far from the cord insertion (pseudocyst). In both cases, obstetric and perinatal follow-up showed favorable outcomes.

32

Two-dimensional (A) and three-dimensional (B) transvaginal ultrasound demonstrating a hydropic yolk sac (YS) compared with the embryo (E). Am, amniotic membrane; Cel. cavity, extracelomic cavity.

33

Two-dimensional ultrasound images showing enlarged yolk sacs (YS) in an anembryonic pregnancy (A) and a pregnancy with a single embryo (B) .

34

Two-dimensional ultrasound performed using the transvaginal approach in an anembryonic pregnancy at 6 weeks' gestation showing a hydropic yolk sac (YS) of 10.2 × 9.6 mm.

35

Two-dimensional (A) and three-dimensional (B) transvaginal ultrasound showing a extremely small and hyperechogenic yolk sac at 7 weeks' gestation.

36

Two-dimensional (A) and three-dimensional (B) ultrasound showing an altered amnion/embryo ratio. Amn., amniotic membrane; E, embryo; YS, yolk sac.

MULTIPLE PREGNANCY

Conjoined twins can be seen in 1 : 50,000 to 1 : 100,000 live births58,59 and may result from an incomplete division of the zygote between the 13th and 15th day post-fertilization.60 The pathogenetic mechanisms are not fully understood. Conjoined twins may be secondary to a failed or delayed separation or secondary to stem cell fusion of the cotwins in monozygotic-monoamniotic twinning.61,62,63,64,65 With high-resolution transvaginal ultrasound, conjoined twins can be diagnosed during the first trimester, including at approximately 10 weeks' gestation.66 (Figure 37) Cephalothoracopagus is estimated to occur in approximately 1 in 3,000,000 live births and accounts for around 1 in 58 cases of conjoined twinning. Perturbation in the maternal gene Vg1, a member of the TGF-beta family that regulates dorso-anterior development and specific actions of Hox and Pax genes during early embryogenesis, may have potential implications as one of the pathogenetic mechanisms.67 Furthermore, Werner et al. have demonstrated that monochorionic-diamniotic quadruplet twin pregnancy may be detected as early as 11 weeks’ gestation using transvaginal three-dimensional ultrasound.68

37

Three-dimensional ultrasound in surface rendering mode (A) and color Doppler ultrasound (B) in a fetus at 10 weeks' gestation showing conjoined thoracopagus twins sharing a single heart (arrow). Note the pleural effusion.

When monochorionic twins have an altered circulation characterized by the presence of wide artery-to-artery and vein-to-vein anastomoses that cause the exclusion of vascular perfusion of one twin (the 'acardiac twin', to be distinguished from the other, discordant cotwin, i.e. the 'pump' twin), a situation known as twin reversed arterial perfusion (TRAP) occurs. TRAP sequence is a rare complication of monochorionic twin pregnancy, occurring in approximately 2.5% of monochorionic twin pregnancies,697071 and usually the acardiac twin is also affected by acrania (Figure 38).69

38

Three-dimensional transvaginal ultrasound without (A) and with (B) Crystal Vue™ rendering mode, showing twin reversed arterial perfusion (TRAP) sequence at 9 weeks' gestation: note the discordant, acardiac twin (Ac.Twin) with associated acrania compared with the normal cotwin (pump twin). YS, yolk sac.


Table 2 summarizes the congenital anomalies that may be detected by ultrasound between 7 and 10 weeks' gestation, together with the corresponding Carnegie stage, CRL, gestational age and associated karyotypic abnormalities.

2

Congenital anomalies detectable by ultrasound between 7 and 10 weeks' gestation, with corresponding Carnegie stage, crown–rump length (CRL), gestational age and associated karyotype.

Carnegie stage

CRL
(mm)

GA
(weeks)

Detectable anomaly

Karyotype

16–18

 9–16

7–8

Conjoined twins

Usually normal

18

16–17

 8 

Early amniotic rupture


18–≥23

16–≥29

 8–10

Acrania/exencephaly/anencephaly sequence

Usually normal

18–≥23

16–≥29

 8–10

Alobar holoprosencephaly (HPE)

Trisomy 13/trisomy 18

22–23

30–35

<11 (9–10)

Meningo-encephalocele

Usually normal

22–23

30–35

 9–10

Decapitation (decollatio) caused by amniotic band syndrome

Usually normal
46,XX (this case)

19–22

26–35

 9–10

Limb defects: ectrodactyly, caudal regression syndrome (sirenomelia), limb agenesis


22–23

30–35

10 

Increased nuchal translucency (NT), subcutaneous edema and pleural effusion

Chromosomal abnormalities

23

>35

10 

Twin reversed arterial perfusion (TRAP) sequence

Usually normal. Possible discordance for single gene mutations and X-inactivation and imprinting

 23

>35

10+

OEIS complex, patent urachus, cloacal exstrophy

9q34.1-qter deletion, monosomy 1p36



10–14

Body-stalk anomaly

Usually normal karyotype; placental trisomy 16, placental mosaic trisomy 2, maternal uniparental disomy 16

CONCLUSION

Since the introduction of sonoembryology into prenatal imaging and following the technological development of three-dimensional ultrasound, there is a substantial overlap between findings on microscopic examination and on imaging of the embryonic and early fetal period. While the embryonic period has been classified according to 23 Carnegie stages, no such classification is used for the fetal period. The fetal period can be divided into the early fetal period (from 10+1 to 10+6 weeks’ gestation) and the late first-trimester fetal period (11+0 to 13+6 weeks’ gestation). During the late first-trimester fetal period, a combined test based on the measurement of nuchal translucency and biochemical analytes (free β-hCG + PAPP-A) and enhancement of the combined test with analysis of cell-free fetal DNA, is considered the gold standard of care and is used as a screening tool for common trisomy. Prenatal ultrasound detection of congenital anomalies is possible during the embryonic and early fetal periods, and an increasing number of congenital anomalies are being detected. Although a series of congenital malformations may be correctly identified with the early first-trimester scan, caution should be exercised in targeted cases such as those with posterior fossa defects or LUTO, which require serial follow-up scans. The introduction of 3D virtual and physical models of congenital anomalies, as well as artificial intelligence, are still at an early stage, and time will be needed before these technologies can be incorporated into daily practice after demonstrating their clinical usefulness

ACKNOWLEDGMENTS

We would like to thank the following for their kind collaboration and contribution: Dr Mario Lituania, Department of Preconceptional and Prenatal Pathophysiology, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, E.O. Ospedali Galliera, Genoa, Italy; Dr Alessandro Cecchi and Dr Elisa Carboni, Centro Unico Regionale ASUR, Departmental 2nd Level Service of Prenatal Diagnosis, Community Hospital, Loreto, Italy.

The images and videos of 3D human embryo models were provided by the Joint MRC/Wellcome Trust (Grants MR/006237/1, MR/X008304/1 and 226202/Z/22/Z) Human Developmental Biology Resource (https://hdbratlas.org/), to whom we extend our deep appreciation and gratitude.

PRACTICE RECOMMENDATIONS

  • The embryonic period is classified into 23 morphological Carnegie stages according to the development of internal and external anatomic structures.
  • There is no similar classification for the fetal period that takes place from 10 weeks' gestation onwards.
  • With the advent of modern real-time high-frequency ultrasound machines and especially with the introduction of the three-dimensional ultrasound allowing in-vivo volume rendering of the embryonic and fetal structures, the developing fetal brain has become visible and anatomical findings almost overlap with those seen by embryology.
  • The improvement in ultrasound technology has enabled the creation of a targeted discipline of fetal imaging called 'sonoembryology'.
  • Three-dimensional and four-dimensional ultrasound complement conventional two-dimensional imaging by providing realistic visualization of the developing embryo and early fetus and enhancing appreciation of the spatial relationships of developing structures.
  • An increasing number of early first-trimester diagnoses of congenital anomalies is now possible, from early defective implantation, embryonic-to-amniotic disproportion, conjoined twinning, gastrulation abnormality leading to holoprosencephaly, neural tube defects, thoracic, abdominal wall defects, lower urinary tract obstruction and skeletal dysplasia.


CONFLICTS OF INTEREST

The author(s) of this chapter declare that they have no interests that conflict with the contents of the chapter.

REFERENCES

1

Timor-Tritsch IE, Farine D, Rosen MG. A close look at the embryonic development with the high frequency transvaginal transducer. Am J Obstet Gynecol 1988;159:678–861.

2

Timor-Trisch IE, Peisner DB, Raju S. Sonoembryology: an organ-oriented approach using high-frequence vaginal probe. J Clin Ultrasound 1990;18:86–298.

3

de Bakker BS, de Jong KH, Hagoort J, et al. An interactive three-dimensional digital atlas and quantitative database of human development. Science 2016;25:354(6315):aag0053. doi: 10.1126/science.aag0053.

4

de Bakker BS, de Jong KH, Hagoort J, et al. Towards a 3-dimensional atlas of the developing human embryo: the Amsterdam experience. Reprod Toxicol 2012;34:225–36. doi: 10.1016/j.reprotox.2012.05.087.

5

Dawood Y, Buijtendijk MFJ, Shah H, et al. Imaging fetal anatomy. Semin Cell Dev Biol 2022;131:78–92. doi: 10.1016/j.semcdb.2022.02.023.

6

Moris N, Shahbazi M. Unravelling the mysteries of human embryogenesis. Semi Cell Dev Biol 2022;131:1–3.

7

https://hdbratlas.org.

8

O’Railly R, Müller F. Developmental Stages of Human Embryos, 637 ed. Carnegie Institute of Washington Publication, 1987.

9

Müller F, O’Rahilly R. The human brain at stages 21–23, with particular reference to the cerebral cortical plate and the development of the cerebellum. Anat Embryol 1990;182:375–400.

10

O’Rahilly R, Müller F. Ventricular system and choroid plexuses of the human brain during the embryonic period proper. Am J Anat 1990;189:285–302.

11

O’Rahilly R, Müller F. The embryonic human brain: an atlas of developmental stages. New York: Wiley-Liss, 1999, 2nd edn.

12

Blaas H-G, Eik-Nes SH, Kiserud T, et al. Early development of the forebrain and midbrain: a longitudinal ultrasound study from 7 to 12 weeks of gestation. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 1994;4:183–92. doi: 10.1046/j.1469-0705.1994.04030183.x.

13

Blaas H-G, Eik-Nes SH, Kiserud T, et al. Early development of the hindbrain: a longitudinal ultrasound study from 7 to 12 weeks of gestation. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 1995;5:151–60. doi: 10.1046/j.1469-0705.1995.05030151.x.

14

Blaas H-G, Eik-Nes SH, Kiserud T, et al. Three-dimensional imaging of the brain cavities in human embryos. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 1995;5:228–32. doi: 10.1046/j.1469-0705.1995.05040228.x.

15

Blaas H-G, Eik-Nes SH, Berg S, et al. In-vivo three-dimensional ultrasound reconstructions of embryos and early fetuses. Lancet 1998;352:1182–6. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(98)03227-9.

16

Blaas H-G, Eik-Nes SH, Bremnes JB. Embryonic growth. A longitudinal biometric ultrasound study. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 1998;12:346–54. doi: 10.1046/j.1469-0705.1998.12050346.x.

17

Blaas H-GK, Eik-Nes SH. The description of the early development of the human central nervous system using two- and three-dimensional ultrasound. In: Hanson M, Lagercrantz H. (eds.) The Newborn Brain-Neuroscience and Clinical Applications. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2002:278–88.

18

Blaas H-GK, Eik-Nes SH. Chapter 4: Ultrasound assessment of normal fetal brain development. In: Levine M, Chervenak F, Whittle M. (eds.) Fetal and Neonatal Neurology and Neurosurgery, 4th edn. London: Churchill Livingstone, 2008.

19

Blaas HG, Eik-Nes SH. Sonoembryology and early prenatal diagnosis of neural anomalies. Prenat Diagn 2009;29:312–25. doi: 10.1002/pd.2170.

20

Blaas HGK. Detection of structural abnormalities in the first trimester using ultrasound. Best Pract Res Clin Obstet Gynecol 2014;28:341–53.

21

Larsen WJ. Human Embryology. Edizione Italiana a cura di Romagnoli P. Idelson-Gnocchi (ed.) 2002:134–5. ISBN: 8879473417.

22

Moss ML. The functional matrix hypothesis revisited. 1. The role of mechanotransduction. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 1997;112:8–11. doi: 10.1016/s0889-5406(97)70267-1.

23

Moss ML. The functional matrix hypothesis revisited. 2. The role of an osseous connected cellular network. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 1997;112:221–6. doi: 10.1016/s0889-5406(97)70249-x.

24

Moss ML. The functional matrix hypothesis revisited. 3. The genomic thesis. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 1997;112:338–42. doi: 10.1016/S0889-5406(97)70265-8.

25

Moss ML. The functional matrix hypothesis revisited. 4. The epigenetic antithesis and the resolving synthesis. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 1997;112:410–7. doi: 10.1016/s0889-5406(97)70049-0.

26

Rosignoli L, Tonni G, Centini G. Cranial development in the first trimester: the use of 3D in the study of complex structures. Imagin Med 2010;2:251–7. doi: 10.2217/iim.10.14.

27

Blaas H-GK, Eik-Nes SH, Vainio T, et al. Alobar holoprosencephaly at 9 weeks gestational age visualized by two and three-dimensional ultrasound. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 2000;15:62–5. doi: 10.1046/j.1469-0705.2000.00005.x.

28

Blaas H-GK, Eik-Nes SH, Isaksen CV. The detection of spina bifida before 10 gestational weeks using 2D- and 3D ultrasound. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 2000;16:5–29. doi: 10.1046/j.1469-0705.2000.00149.x.

29

Blaas H. Picture of the month. Holoprosencephaly at 10 weeks 2 days (CRL 33 mm). Ultrasound Gynecol Obstet 2000;15:86–7.

30

Cavalli P, Tonni G, Grosso E, et al. Effects of inositol supplementation in a cohort of mothers at risk of producing an NTD pregnancy. Birth Defects Res A Clin Mol Teratol 2011;91:962–5. doi: 10.1002/bdra.22853.

31

Cavalli P, Cavallari U, Unfer V, et al. Caffeine intake and risk of neural tube defects. Birth Defects Res A Clin Mol Teratol 2011;91:67; author reply. doi: 10.1002/bdra.20739.

32

Martins Santana EF, Araujo Júnior E, Tonni G, et al. Acrania-exencephaly-anencephaly sequence phenotypic characterization using two- and three-dimensional ultrasound between 11 and 13 weeks and 6 days of gestation. J Ultrason 2018;18:240–6. doi: 10.15557/JoU.2018.0035.

33

Tonni G, Grisolia G, Rizzo G, et al. 'Turkish turban' sign: rare phenotype of acrania-exencephaly-anencephaly sequence. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 2023;61:417–8. doi: 10.1002/uog.26086.

34

Sepulveda W, De La Maza F, Meagher S. An Unusual First-Trimester Ultrasound Presentation of the Acrania-Anencephaly Sequence: The "Turkish Turban" Sign. J Ultrasound Med 2020;39:829–2. doi: 10.1002/jum.15161.

35

Weichert J, Sepulveda W, Gembicki M. Further insights into unusual acrania-exencephaly-anencephaly sequence caused by amniotic band – first trimester fetoscopic correlation with two- and three-dimensional ultrasound. Case Rep Perinat Med 2021;10:20210023.

36

Wertaschnigg D, Reddy M, Ramkrishna J, et al. Ultrasound appearances of the acrania-anencephaly sequence at 10 to 14 weeks' gestation. J Ultrasound Med 2020;39:1695–700. doi: 10.1002/jum.15267.

37

Lewis HL. Iniencephalus. Am J Obstet Gynecol 1987;35:11–53.

38

Romero R, Pilu G, Jeanty P. Prenatal Diagnosis of Congenital Anomalies. Nowalk, CT: Appleton & Lange, 1988.

39

Dogan MM, Ekici E, Yapar EG, et al. Iniencephaly: Sonographic-pathologic correlation of 19 cases. J Perinat Med 1996;24:505–11. doi: 10.1515/jpme.1996.24.5.501.

40

Sepulveda W, Corral E, Ayala C, et al. Chromosomal abnormalities in fetuses with open neural tube defects: Prenatal identification with ultrasound. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 2004;23:352–256. doi: 10.1002/uog.964.

41

Tonni G, Azzoni D, Panteghini M, et al. First trimester diagnosis of iniencephaly associated with fetal malformations and trisomy 18: report of a new case and gene analysis on folate metabolism in parents. Congenit Anom (Kyoto) 2007;47:101–4. doi: 10.1111/j.1741-4520.2007.00154.x.

42

Aleksic S, Budzilovich G, Greco MA, et al. Iniencephaly: A neuropathologic study. Clin Neuropathol 1983;2:55–61.

43

O’Rahilly R, Muller F. Development of anencephaly and its variant. Am J Anat 1991;190:193–218.

44

Phadke SR, Thakur S. Prenatal diagnosis of iniencephaly and alobar holoprosencephaly with trisomy 13 mosaicism. Prenat Diagn 2002;22:1240–1. doi: 10.1002/pd.484.

45

Turner CD, Silva S, Jeanty P. Prenatal diagnosis of alobar holoprosencephaly at 10 weeks of gestation. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 1999;13:360–2. doi: 10.1046/j.1469-0705.1999.13050360.x.

46

Blaas HG, Eik-Nes SH, Vainio T, et al. Alobar holoprosencephaly at 9 weeks gestational age visualized by two- and three-dimensional ultrasound. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 2000;15:62–5. doi: 10.1046/j.1469-0705.2000.00005.x.

47

Meagher S, Hui L. Alobar holoprosencephaly detected in a 9-week embryo. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2019;221:73–4. doi: 10.1016/j.ajog.2018.12.019.

48

Sepulveda W, Lutz I, Be C. Holoprosencephaly at 9 weeks 6 days in a triploid fetus. J Ultrasound Med 2007;26:411–4. doi: 10.7863/jum.2007.26.3.411.

49

Nelson LH, King M. Early diagnosis of holoprosencephaly. J Ultrasound Med 1992;11:57–9. doi: 10.7863/jum.1992.11.1.57.

50

Wong HS, Lam YH, Tang MH, et al. First trimester ultrasound diagnosis of holoprosencephaly: three case reports. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 1999;13:356–9. doi: 10.1046/j.1469-0705.1999.13050356.x.

51

Matsunaga E, Shiota K. Holoprosencephaly in human embryos: epidemiologic studies of 150 cases. Teratology 1977;16:261–72. doi: 10.1002/tera.1420160304.

52

Addissie YA, Kruszka P, Troia A, et al. Prenatal exposure to pesticides and risk for holoprosencephaly: a case-control study. Environ Health 2020;8:19:65. doi: 10.1186/s12940-020-00611-z.

53

Leoncini E, Baranello G, Orioli IM, et al. Frequency of holoprosencephaly in the international clearinghouse birth defects surveillance systems: searching for population variations. Birth Defects Res Part A Clin Mol Teratol 2008;82:585–91. doi: 10.1002/bdra.20479.

54

Yi L, Liu Z, Deng C, et al. Epidemiological characteristics of holoprosencephaly in China, 2007–2014: a retrospective study based on the national birth defects surveillance system. PLoS One 2019;14:e0217835.

55

Kruszka P, Martinez AF, Muenke M. Molecular testing in holoprosencephaly. Am J Med Genet C Semin Med Genet 2018;178:187–93. doi: 10.1002/ajmg.c.31617.

56

Kruszka P, Muenke M. Syndromes associated with holoprosencephaly. Am J Med Genet C Semin Med Genet 2018;178:229–37. doi: 10.1002/ajmg.c.31620.

57

Wang J, Lu J, Mook RA Jr, et al. The insecticide synergist piperonyl butoxide inhibits hedgehog signaling: assessing chemical risks. Toxicol Sci 2012;128:517–23. doi: 10.1093/toxsci/kfs165.

58

Rees AEJ, Vujanic GM, Williams WM. Epidemic of conjoined twins in Cardiff. British J Obstet Gynaecol 1993;100:388–91. doi: 10.1111/j.1471-0528.1993.tb12987.x.

59

Rees AE, Vujanic GM. Epidemic of conjoined twins in Cardiff. Br J Obstet Gynaecol 1993;100:701. doi: 10.1111/j.1471-0528.1993.tb14247.x.

60

Osmanağaoğlu MA, Aran T, Güven S, et al. Thoracopagus conjoined twins: a case report. ISRN Obstet Gynecol 2011;2011:238360. doi: 10.5402/2011/238360.

61

Grutter F, Marguerat P, Maillard-Brignon C, et al. Foetus thoracopages. Diagnostic échographique à 16 semaines [Thoracopagus fetus. Ultrasonic diagnosis at 16 weeks]. J Gynecol Obstet Biol Reprod (Paris) 1989;18:355–9. [Article in French].

62

Abossolo T, Dancoisne P, Tuaillon J, et al. Early prenatal diagnosis of asymmetric cephalothoracopagus twins. Journal Gyn Obst Biol Reprod 1994;23:79–84. [Article in French].

63

Singla V, Singh P, Gupta P, et al. Prenatal diagnosis of thoracopagus fetus: a case report with brief review of literature. Arch Gynecol Obstet 2009;280:1025–7. doi: 10.1007/s00404-009-1054-8.

64

Spencer R. Theoretical and analytical embryology of conjoined twins: part I: embryogenesis. Clinical Anatomy 2000;13:36–53. doi: 10.1002/(SICI)1098-2353(2000)13:1<36::AID-CA5>3.0.CO;2-3.

65

Spencer R. Theoretical and analytical embryology of conjoined twins: part II: adjustments to union. Clinical Anatomy 2000;13:97–120. doi: 10.1002/(SICI)1098-2353(2000)13:2<97::AID-CA5>3.0.CO;2-I.

66

Hubinont C, Kollmann P, Malvaux V, et al. First-trimester diagnosis of conjoined twins. Fetal Diagnosis and Therapy 1997;12:185–7. doi: 10.1159/000264463.

67

Tonni G, Ventura A, Vito I, et al. Cephalothoracopagus, janiceps, disymmetros, monoomphalian conjoined twins undiagnosed until early second trimester. Arch Gynecol Obstet 2011;283:387–90. doi: 10.1007/s00404-010-1440-2.

68

Werner H, Castro P, Daltro P, et al. Monochorionic diamniotic quadruplet pregnancy: physical models from prenatal three-dimensional ultrasound and magnetic resonance imaging data. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 2017;49:812–4. doi: 10.1002/uog.17243.

69

Tonni G, Grisolia G, Zampriolo P, et al. TRAP Sequence in Monochorionic/Monoamniotic (MC/MA) Discordant Twins: Two Cases Treated with Fetoscopic Laser Surgery. Fetal Pediatr Pathol 2018;37:433–47. doi: 10.1080/15513815.2018.1526240.

70

Cabassa P, Fichera A, Prefumo F, et al. The use of radiofrequency in the treatment of twin reversed arterial perfusion sequence: a case series and review of the literature. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol 2013;166:127–32. doi: 10.1016/j.ejogrb.2012.10.009.

71

Khalil A, Sotiriadis A, Baschat A, Bhide A, Gratacós E, Hecher K, Lewi L, Salomon LJ, Thilaganathan B, Ville Y. ISUOG Practice Guidelines (updated): role of ultrasound in twin pregnancy. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2025 Feb;65(2):253-276. doi: 10.1002/uog.29166. 

72

Smrcek JM, Germer U, Krokowski M, et al. Prenatal ultrasound diagnosis and management of body stalk anomaly: analysis of nine singleton and two multiple pregnancies. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 2003;21:322–8. doi: 10.1002/uog.84.

73

Daskalakis G, Sebire N, Jurkovic D, et al. Body stalk anomaly at 10–14 weeks of gestation. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 1997;10:416–8. doi: 10.1046/j.1469-0705.1997.10060416.x.

74

Morrow R, Whittle M, McNay M, et al. Prenatal diagnosis and management of anterior abdominal wall defects in the west of Scotland. Prenat Diagn 1993;13:111–5. doi: 10.1002/pd.1970130205.

75

Mann L, Ferguson-Smith M, Desai M, et al. Prenatal assessment of anterior abdominal wall defects and their prognosis. Prenat Diagn 1984;4:427–35. doi: 10.1002/pd.1970040606.

76

Lockwood C, Scioscia A, Hobbins J. Congenital absence of the umbilical cord resulting from maldevelopment of embryonic body folding. Am J Obstet Gynecol 1986;155:1049–51. doi: 10.1016/0002-9378(86)90345-5.

77

Van Allen M, Curry C, Gallagher L. Limb-body wall complex: I. Pathogenesis. Am J Med Genet 1987;28:529–48. doi: 10.1002/ajmg.1320280302.

78

Van Allen M, Curry C, Walden C, et al. Limb body wall complex: II. Limb and spine defects. Am J Med Genet 1987;28:549–65. doi: 10.1002/ajmg.1320280303.

79

Russo R, D’Armiento M, Angrisani P, et al. Limb body wall complex: a critical review and a nosological proposal. Am J Med Genet 1993;47:893–900. doi: 10.1002/ajmg.1320470617.

80

Bair JH, Russ PD, Pretorius DH, et al. Fetal omphalocele and gastroschisis: a review of 24 cases. AJR Am J Roentgenol 1986;147(5):1047–51. doi: 10.2214/ajr.147.5.1047.

81

Youngblood JP, Franklin DW, Stein RT. Omphalocele: early prenatal diagnosis by ultrasound. J Clin Ultrasound 1983;11:339–41. doi: 10.1002/jcu.1870110614.

82

Hauge M, Bugge M, Nielsen J. Early prenatal diagnosis of omphalocele constitutes indication for amniocentesis. Lancet 1983;2(8348):507. doi: 10.1016/s0140-6736(83)90528-7.

83

Wilson RD, McGillivray BC. Omphalocele: early prenatal diagnosis by ultrasound. J Clin Ultrasound 1984;12:A-2, A-4. doi: 10.1002/jcu.1870120502.

84

Chen CP, Wang LK, Chern SR, et al. First-trimester diagnosis of recurrent omphalocele associated with fetal trisomy 18 but without parental mosaicism. Taiwan J Obstet Gynecol 2015;54:194–5. doi: 10.1016/j.tjog.2015.01.001.

85

Tassin M, Benachi A. Diagnosis of abdominal wall defects in the first trimester. Curr Opin Obstet Gynecol 2014;26:104–9. doi: 10.1097/GCO.0000000000000053.

86

Verla MA, Style CC, Olutoye OO. Prenatal diagnosis and management of omphalocele. Semin Pediatr Surg 2019;28:84–8. doi: 10.1053/j.sempedsurg.2019.04.007.

87

Wladimiroff JW, Molenaar JC, Niermeijer MF, et al. Prenatal diagnosis and management of omphalocele. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol 1983;16:19–23. doi: 10.1016/0028-2243(83)90215-0.

88

Gibbin C, Touch S, Broth RE, et al. Abdominal wall defects and congenital heart disease. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 2003;21:334–7. doi: 10.1002/uog.93.

89

Shi X, Tang H, Lu J, et al. Prenatal genetic diagnosis of omphalocele by karyotyping, chromosomal microarray analysis and exome sequencing. Ann Med 2021;53:1285–91. doi: 10.1080/07853890.2021.1962966.

90

Tonni G, Pattaccini P, Ventura A, et al. The role of ultrasound and antenatal single-shot fast spin-echo MRI in the evaluation of herniated bowel in case of first trimester ultrasound diagnosis of fetal gastroschisis. Arch Gynecol Obstet 2011;283:903–8. doi: 10.1007/s00404-010-1642-7.

91

Sasaki Y, Miyamoto T, Hidaka Y, et al. Three-dimensional magnetic resonance imaging after ultrasonography for assessment of fetal gastroschisis. Magn Reson Imaging 2006;24:201–3. doi: 10.1016/j.mri.2005.10.006.

92

Sebire NJ, Von Kaisenberg C, Rubio C, et al. Fetal megacystis at 10–14 weeks of gestation. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 1996;8:387–90. doi: 10.1046/j.1469-0705.1997.08060387.x.

93

McHugo J, Whittle M. Enlarged fetal bladders: aetiology, management and outcome. Prenat Diagn 2001;21:958–63. doi: 10.1002/pd.227.

94

Fontanella F, Maggio L, Verheij JBGM, et al. Fetal megacystis: a lot more than LUTO. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 2019;53:779–87. doi: 10.1002/uog.19182.

95

Malin G, Tonks AM, Morris RK, et al. Congenital lower urinary tract obstruction: a population-based epidemiological study. BJOG 2012;119:1455–64. doi: 10.1111/j.1471-0528.2012.03476.x.

96

Al-Hazmi H, Dreux S, Delezoide AL, et al. Outcome of prenatally detected bilateral higher urinary tract obstruction or megacystis: sex-related study on a series of 709 cases. Prenat Diagn 2012;32:649–54. doi: 10.1002/pd.3877.

97

Montemarano H, Bulas DI, Rushton HG, et al. Bladder distention and pyelectasis in the male fetus: causes, comparisons, and contrasts. J Ultrasound Med 1998;17:743–9. doi: 10.7863/jum.1998.17.12.743.

98

Bardi F, Smith E, Kuilman M, et al. Early detection of structural anomalies in a primary care setting in the Netherlands. Fetal Diagn Ther 2019;46:12–9. doi: 10.1159/000490723.

99

Bardi F, Bergman JEH, Siemensma-Mühlenberg N, et al. Prenatal diagnosis and pregnancy outcome of major structural anomalies detectable in the first trimester: A population-based cohort study in the Netherlands. Paediatr Perinat Epidemiol 2022;36:804–14. doi: 10.1111/ppe.12914.

100

Vinit N, Bessieres B, Spaggiari E, et al. Pathological and sonographic review of early isolated severe lower urinary tract obstruction and implications for prenatal treatment. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 2022;59:513–21. doi: 10.1002/uog.23718.

101

Zangen R, Boldes R, Yaffe H, et al. Umbilical cord cysts in the second and third trimesters: significance and prenatal approach. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 2010;36:296–301. doi: 10.1002/uog.7576.

102

Goldstein SR, Kerenyi T, Scher J, et al. Correlation between karyotype and ultrasound findings in patients with failed early pregnancy. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 1996;8:314–7. doi: 10.1046/j.1469-0705.1996.08050314.x.

Online Study Assessment Option
All readers who are qualified doctors or allied medical professionals can automatically receive 2 Continuing Professional Development points plus a Study Completion Certificate from GLOWM for successfully answering four multiple-choice questions (randomly selected) based on the study of this chapter. Medical students can receive the Study Completion Certificate only.

 

(To find out more about the Continuing Professional Development awards program CLICK HERE)